Tech Blind Spots at the Letter of Intent (LOI) Stage; And How a Red Flag Scan Keeps Them from Torpedoing Your Deal
- mdoody0
- 4 days ago
- 3 min read
Updated: 3 days ago
The silent killer of great valuations
If you’ve ever sat in an Investment Committee meeting and heard the words “We’ll firm up the tech risks in confirmatory diligence”, you already know the sinking feeling that follows. By the time confirmatory diligence arrives, the headline price is public, the seller has leverage, and your ability to negotiate fades by the hour.
The reality is simple: technology debt, latent security exposure, talent concentration and inflated claims about “AI‑powered” products rarely appear in a CIM. Catch them after exclusivity, and you’re left renegotiating under time pressure or swallowing an ugly post‑close capex bill. Catch them before the LOI is final, and you control the narrative.
That’s why we created the Impact Red Flag Scan.
What the Impact Red Flag Scan is
Think of it as a pre‑LOI tech reconnaissance mission—lightweight enough to complete between management meetings, rigorous enough to surface value‑breaking issues. We combine three data‑gathering threads:
Targeted artefact review – architecture diagrams, security policies, backlog metrics, vendor contracts.
Focused leadership interviews – CTO, lead engineers, security owner, key suppliers.
Rapid analytics pulse – build cadence, incident density, talent concentration, and other leading indicators that correlate with technical debt or over‑hyped AI claims.
No source‑code pulls. No intrusive scanners. No spooking the seller. The result is a sharp, defensible view of technology health that still respects the speed and confidentiality of a live auction process.
Turning geek‑speak into deal math: the VIM Score.
Raw findings are powerful, but boards buy numbers. So every Red Flag Scan is distilled into a single composite rating—the Valuation Impact Matrix, or VIM Score™.
Eight proprietary vectors now include AI Readiness / AI Substance—so if the target markets “machine‑learning magic” that’s really a rules engine, you’ll know. The other vectors cover scalability, cyber resilience, IP integrity, organisational depth, and more.
The score lands on a 0‑100 scale that mirrors familiar traffic‑light logic—80+ is green, 65‑79 amber, below 65 red.
We deliver the output as both XLS and JSON, so your modelling team can drop it straight into DealCloud, Power BI, or a simple Excel sensitivity table—no re‑keying, no translation layer.
Instead of debating whether “tech looks okay,” you can quantify how many points of multiple expansion a remediation or AI re‑platform would protect—or whether the price needs trimming before you sign.
At the end of the engagement you’ll have a tight, board‑ready packet you can circulate on Sunday night and defend on Monday morning. Everything is formatted for fast digestion—ideal for PE operating partners, credit committees, and busy portfolio CFOs who need an answer in minutes, not hours.
What happens after the scan?
If the target still looks attractive, we segue into Impact Due Diligence—a 30‑day deep dive that validates code quality, runs security testing, pressure‑tests scalability, audits AI pipelines, and produces a day‑one integration roadmap. Because the due‑diligence phase builds directly on the eight VIM vectors, no data is lost in translation; the Scan simply becomes Chapter 1 of a fuller technology playbook.
Why early tech clarity changes everything
Valuation defence – Quantified risk lets you open price negotiations before exclusivity, when leverage is still yours.
Bid/no‑bid confidence – Knowing that a platform can’t scale—or that its “AI” is marketing fluff—is reason enough to step away early.
Faster time‑to‑value – Red flags surfaced early translate into remediation plans you can mobilise on Day 1, not six months post‑close.
Most scans wrap in five to ten calendar days (seven is the norm)—fast enough for tight auction timetables, thorough enough to change deal economics.
Comentarios